Stochastic Congestion Games with Risk-Averse Players
نویسندگان
چکیده
Congestion games ignore the stochastic nature of resource delays and the risk-averse attitude of the players to uncertainty. To take these aspects into account, we introduce two variants of atomic congestion games, one with stochastic players, where each player assigns load to her strategy independently with a given probability, and another with stochastic edges, where the latency functions are random. In both variants, the players are risk-averse, and their individual cost is a player-specific quantile of their delay distribution. We focus on parallel-link networks and investigate how the main properties of such games depend on the risk attitude and on the participation probabilities of the players. In a nutshell, we prove that stochastic congestion games on parallel-links admit an efficiently computable pure Nash equilibrium if the players have either the same risk attitude or the same participation probabilities, and also admit a potential function if the players have the same risk attitude. On the negative side, we present examples of stochastic games with players of different risk attitudes that do not admit a potential function. As for the inefficiency of equilibria, for parallel-link networks with linear delays, we prove that the Price of Anarchy is Θ(n), where n is the number of stochastic players, and may be unbounded, in case of stochastic edges.
منابع مشابه
A Risk-averse Inventory-based Supply Chain Protection Problem with Adapted Stochastic Measures under Intentional Facility Disruptions: Decomposition and Hybrid Algorithms
Owing to rising intentional events, supply chain disruptions have been considered by setting up a game between two players, namely, a designer and an interdictor contesting on minimizing and maximizing total cost, respectively. The previous studies have found the equilibrium solution by taking transportation, penalty and restoration cost into account. To contribute further, we examine how incor...
متن کاملGames with Congestion-averse and Congestion-seeking Players
The paper studies a class of resource-symmetric singleton congestion games with two types of players having diametrically opposite preferences. Congestion-averse players wish to avoid congestion, while congestion-seeking players favor it. We show that a pure-strategy Nash equilibrium may or may not exist, depending on the number of players of each type and the number of resources in the game. T...
متن کاملThe effect of loss aversion on congestion games
Expected utility maximization is not a good predictive model of how people value outcomes. One of the ways in which people systematically deviate from expected utility maximization is loss aversion, where losses (relative to some reference point) are more highly weighted than gains. I investigate whether and how the theoretical guarantees of congestion games change when the agents are assumed t...
متن کاملEquilibrium selection in evolutionary games with random matching of players.
We discuss stochastic dynamics of populations of individuals playing games. Our models possess two evolutionarily stable strategies: an efficient one, where a population is in a state with the maximal payoff (fitness) and a risk-dominant one, where players are averse to risks. We assume that individuals play with randomly chosen opponents (they do not play against average strategies as in the s...
متن کاملPath Deviations Outperform Approximate Stability in Heterogeneous Congestion Games
We consider non-atomic network congestion games with heterogeneous players where the latencies of the paths are subject to some bounded deviations. This model encompasses several well-studied extensions of the classical Wardrop model which incorporate, for example, risk-aversion, altruism or travel time delays. Our main goal is to analyze the worst-case deterioration in social cost of a deviate...
متن کامل